* * Our SDP  Database  for 40 years now available on interactive CD-ROM  * *                                            * * Our NAS  Database  for 52 years now available on interactive CD-ROM  * *                                      * * Our ASI  Database  for 25 years now available on interactive CD-ROM  * *

Current Economic Statistics and Review For the Week 
Ended December 22, 2007 (51st Weekly Report of 2007)

 

Theme of the week:

 

Situation Assessment Survey: Some Aspects of Farming

 

1. Knowledge, Preference and Awareness of Technological and Institutional Developments in Farming *

 

India has a large agrarian economy with most of its population subsisting in farming. Union government’s efforts to improve the economic well being of the farmers since 1951 is not fruitful to desired extent. To have a dependable and reliable data on farmers and practice of farming, the Union Ministry of Agriculture desired a comprehensive socio-economic study of the Indian farmers, covering educational level, level of living, farming practices, possession of productive assets, awareness and access to modern technology, resources availability, indebtedness and host of other relevant issues. Thus, National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) conducted a special survey known as Situation Assessment Survey of farmers during 2003 in rural areas as part of their 59th round.

 

According the Survey, a farmer has been defined as a person who operated some land (owned or taken on lease or otherwise possessed) and is engaged in agricultural activities on any part of that land during the 365 days preceding the date of the survey. Farmer households are defined as one, which have at least one farmer. Agricultural activities include cultivation of field and horticultural crops, growing of trees or plants such as rubber, cashew, coconut, pepper, coffee, tea, etc., animal husbandry, fishery, bee-keeping, vermiculture, sericulture, etc.

 

The report on farming covers certain aspects like farming practices, farmers awareness of technical and institutional development in farming, resource availability and use, distribution of farmed area and irrigated area over different kinds of farming activity and energy used by farmer households various activities.

 

Based on the results of this survey, a theme note has been prepared earlier covering ‘indebtedness of farmers’ The current note is the second in the series covering some  aspects of farmers’ profile liketheir educational background, farmers’ attitude to farming, and farmers’ awareness of and access to modern technology, self-help groups, cooperatives, crop insurance and sources to procure seeds.

 

I. Magnitude of Farmer Households: The Basic Picture

 

As per the survey, out of 147.9 million rural households, 89.4 million or 60.4 per cent are farmer households. The southern region states namely, Andhra Pradesh (42 per cent), Karnatka (58 per cent), Kerala (44 per cent), and Tamil Nadu (35 per cent) had considerably lower percentages of farmer households than all-India average obviously reflecting better economic diversification of the region away from farming. Two north- eastern region states of Arunachal pradesh (8 per cent) and Tripura (39 per cent) had also very low percentages of farmer households, but this is due to limited scope for agiculture. On the other hand, in another 12 out of 27 states, 75 per cent of the rural households were farmer households. In Jammu and Kashmir , 91 per cent were farmer households (Table 1).

Region wise, broadly these proportions thus reflect the advanced scope for agriculture ( northern and western regions), agriculturally poor and also generally economically poor states (central and eastern states) and the relatively better progress recorded both in agriculture and non-agriculture activities.

Table 1: Estimated number of Rural and Farmer Households

 

Estimated

Estimated Number of

 

Number of

Farmer Households

State/Region

Rural

(' 00)

 

Households

 

 

(' 00)

 

Northern Region

83667

56380

(67.4)

Haryana

31474

19445

(61.8)

Himachal Pradesh

11928

9061

(76.0)

Jammu & Kashmir

10418

9432

(90.5)

Punjab

29847

18442

(61.8)

North-Eastern Region

70915

34874

(49.2)

Arunachal Pradesh

15412

1227

(8.0)

Assam

41525

25040

(60.3)

Manipur

2685

2146

(79.9)

Meghalaya

3401

2543

(74.8)

Mizoram

942

780

(82.8)

Nagaland

973

805

(82.7)

Tripura

5977

2333

(39.0)

Eastern Region

342461

211140

(61.7)

Bihar

116853

70804

(60.6)

Jharkhand

36930

28238

(76.5)

Orissa

66199

42341

(64.0)

Sikkim

812

531

(65.4)

West bengal

121667

69226

(56.9)

Central Region

363672

271341

(74.6)

Chattisgarh

36316

27598

(76.0)

Madhya Pradesh

93898

63206

(67.3)

Uttar Pradesh

221499

171575

(77.5)

Uttranchal

11959

8962

(74.9)

Western Region

251364

156742

(62.4)

Rajasthan

70172

53080

(75.6)

Gujarat

63015

37845

(60.1)

Maharashtra

118177

65817

(55.7)

Southern Region

372544

161578

(43.4)

Andhra Pradesh

142512

60339

(42.3)

Karnataka

69908

40413

(57.8)

Kerala

49942

21946

(43.9)

Tamil Nadu

110182

38880

(35.3)

Uts

2325

732

(31.5)

All India

1478988

893504

(60.4)

Note: Figures in brackets are percentages of farmer to rural households

Source: NSSO (2005), Indebtedness of Farmer Households, 59 th Round (jan-Dec 2003), Report No 498 (59/33/1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

2. Educational Level

 

Table 2 gives the number of persons aged 7 years or more who were engaged in farming in 2003 by ten levels of education as well as the correspondent distribution of all members of farmer households. Only courses successfully completed are considered in ascertaining the educational attainment of a person.

 

Table 2 : Number of Persons in Farmer Households aged  7 years and Above by Level of Education

 

Male ( ' 00)

Female ( ' 00)

 

Farmer

All members*

Farmer

All Members*

Illiterate

459573

(35.1)

590818

(28.0)

609686

(69.2)

1046084

(52.5)

Literate

850671

(64.9)

1521050

(72.0)

271245

(30.8)

944699

(47.4)

of which:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Without formal training

22183

(1.7)

32095

(1.5)

7988

(0.9)

23915

(1.2)

  Below primary

132613

(10.1)

367108

(17.4)

56397

(6.4)

284037

(14.3)

  Primary

206120

(15.7)

388407

(18.4)

89556

(10.2)

278015

(14.0)

  Middle

246375

(18.8)

383238

(18.1)

75119

(8.5)

216593

(10.9)

  Secondary

131679

(10.0)

187917

(8.9)

28043

(3.2)

87698

(4.4)

  Higher Secondary

63045

(4.8)

92308

(4.4)

10040

(1.1)

35344

(1.8)

  Diploma

5846

(0.4)

9589

(0.5)

934

(0.1)

2685

(0.1)

  Graduate

33602

(2.6)

47283

(2.2)

2790

(0.3)

13827

(0.7)

  Post graduate

9208

(0.7)

13105

(0.6)

378

(0.0)

2585

(0.1)

Not responded

290

(0.0)

465

(0.0)

113

(0.0)

833

(0.0)

All-India

1310535

(100.0)

2112333

(100.0)

881044

(100.0)

1991615

(100.0)

Note : Including kith and kin who do farming but do not possess land.

Source : NSSO (2005), Some Aspects of Farming, 59th Round ( jan-Dec). Report No 496 (59/33/3)

 

Out of the 131.1 million male farmers about 65 per cent were literate and out of 88.1 million female farmers only 31 per cent were literate. More or less the same trend is witnessed among all members of farmer households. Out of the 65 per cent literate farmers about 8 per cent had studied at least upto higher secondary and the ratio for females were less than two per cent.

In 15 states out of the 27 states, the percentage of literate farmers was more than the all-India average of 65 per cent. States like Kerala (94 %), Mizoram (92 %) and Nagaland (90%) topped the literacy list among male farmers. The above states also top the list among female farmer literacy (Table 3).

Table 3: Number of Illiterate and Literate Farmer Households

(Number ' 00)

 

Male

Female

State/Region

Illiterate

Literate

Total

Illiterate

Literate

Total

Northern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Haryana

6641

(26.4)

18515

(73.6)

25156

15940

(68.7)

7262

(31.3)

23202

Himachal Pradesh

2021

(16.2)

10453

(83.8)

12474

5593

(38.5)

8920

(61.4)

14527

Jammu & Kashmir

6206

(41.7)

8677

(58.3)

14883

8321

(68.8)

3773

(31.2)

12094

Punjab

8669

(36.5)

15083

(63.5)

23752

11749

(51.9)

10889

(48.1)

22638

Rajasthan

35575

(48.1)

38386

(51.9)

73961

62835

(84.6)

11438

(15.4)

74273

North-Eastern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arunachal Pradesh

371

(43.8)

476

(56.2)

847

391

(57.9)

285

(42.1)

676

Assam

6148

(14.7)

35676

(85.3)

41824

4904

(28.6)

12209

(71.2)

17148

Manipur

738

(23.2)

2438

(76.7)

3179

1338

(47.9)

1455

(52.1)

2793

Meghalaya

572

(15.1)

3214

(84.9)

3786

775

(24.5)

2388

(75.5)

3163

Mizoram

119

(8.4)

1293

(91.6)

1412

126

(10.5)

1078

(89.5)

1204

Nagaland

182

(9.7)

1694

(90.3)

1876

242

(14.3)

1447

(85.7)

1689

Tripura

596

(18.1)

2695

(81.8)

3295

517

(40.6)

757

(59.4)

1274

Eastern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bihar

40856

(38.0)

66660

(62.0)

107516

28571

(84.4)

5281

(15.6)

33852

Jharkhand

17174

(40.1)

25655

(59.9)

42829

25093

(81.6)

5658

(18.4)

30751

Orissa

22917

(36.4)

39978

(63.5)

62958

32082

(77.8)

9113

(22.1)

41236

Sikkim

248

(29.3)

599

(70.7)

847

342

(50.6)

334

(49.4)

676

West bengal

27083

(26.6)

74734

(73.4)

101817

14442

(56.3)

11184

(43.6)

25651

Central Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chattisgarh

14577

(34.9)

27192

(65.1)

41769

26792

(71.1)

10890

(28.9)

37682

Madhya Pradesh

40028

(40.7)

58321

(59.3)

98349

53141

(77.8)

15163

(22.2)

68304

Uttar Pradesh

104219

(39.6)

158960

(60.4)

263179

118763

(81.1)

27677

(18.9)

146440

Uttranchal

1268

(12.3)

9039

(87.7)

10307

6789

(54.0)

5783

(46.0)

12572

Western Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gujarat

15961

(26.9)

43374

(73.1)

59335

31643

(62.4)

19067

(37.6)

50710

Maharashtra

24572

(25.8)

70668

(74.2)

95240

45390

(54.3)

38202

(45.7)

83592

Southern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andhra Pradesh

44477

(52.1)

40806

(47.8)

85368

56346

(79.3)

14708

(20.7)

71054

Karnataka

22554

(35.4)

41158

(64.6)

63712

30504

(65.8)

15854

(34.2)

46358

Kerala

1319

(6.2)

19955

(93.8)

21274

2018

(14.6)

11807

(85.4)

13825

Tamil Nadu

13649

(28.8)

33744

(71.2)

47393

23803

(57.0)

17957

(43.0)

41760

Uts

228

(23.7)

732

(76.2)

961

446

(57.5)

330

(42.5)

776

All India

459573

(35.1)

850962

(64.9)

1310535

609686

(69.2)

271358

(30.8)

881044

Note: Figures in brackets are percentages of total males/females in the respective states.

Source: NSSO (2005), Indebtedness of Farmer Households, 59th Round (Jan-Dec 2003)

Report No. 498 (59/33/1)

 

 

 

3. Awareness of Different Concepts

 

a          Bio-fertilisers: Bio-fertilisers are not soil nutrients by themselves. They act as a catalyst or direct agents in making the plant nutrients available to the soil. Bio-fertilisers carry some bacteria living in an organic base.  Some examples are Rhizobium, Azotobactor, Phosphate Solubalizing Bacterial (PSB) etc. Out of the estimated 89.4 million farmer households, only 16.1 million farmer households (18% of total) were aware about bio-fertilisers. Awareness about bio-fertilisers was very high in Nagaland (70%), Kerala (55 %), and Tamil Nadu (47 %) (Table 4).

 

b          Minimum Support Price(MSP): Minimum support price has been announced by the Government of India with a view to ensuring remunerative prices to the farmers for their produce on the basis of the recommendations of Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP). The farmers perceive these prices as a guarantee price for their produce from the government. The government at the commencement of the season announces the prices, to enable the farmers to pursue their efforts with the assurance that the prices would not be allowed to fall below the level fixed by the government. MSP are fixed at incentive level, so as to induce the farmers to make capital investment for the improvement of their farm and to motivate them to adopt improved crop production technologies to step up their production and by their net income.

 

The procurement agency pays the minimum support prices to the farmers for their crops. The important procurement agencies are Food Corporation of India (FCI) for foodgrains like rice and wheat, Jute Corporation of India (JCI) for Jute, Cotton Corporation of India (CCI) for cotton and National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. (NAFED) for pulses and oilseeds.

 

Of the total 89.4 million farmer households, 62.8 million (70.4%) were unaware about minimum support price. But 16.9 million farmer households not only know about MSP but also knew the detail of the procurement agency. Another 8.8 million farmer households know about MSP but not aware about the procurement agency.

Table 4 : Per cent Distribution of Farmer Households Having Awareness of Some Aspects of Farming

 

Minimum Support Price (MSP)

Bio-fertiliser

World Trade

Organisation

Estd No

 

aware of

not aware

Not

Aware

Not

Aware

Not

of hhs

 

procure-

of procur-

Aware

 

Aware

 

Aware

('00)

 

ment

ement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agency

Agency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Northern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Haryana

43.6

16.0

33.3

8.7

86.4

11.4

87.7

19445

Himachal Pradesh

12.8

9.0

78.2

11.6

88.4

8.2

91.8

9061

Jammu & Kashmir

15.5

11.3

73.2

28.4

71.6

7.2

92.8

9432

Punjab

53.0

7.9

36.8

6.4

8.7

23.1

75.7

18442

Rajasthan

5.5

5.0

89.5

10.0

90.0

2.3

97.7

53080

North-Eastern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arunachal Pradesh

10.2

12.2

76.0

16.3

81.7

8.2

89.8

1227

Assam

11.5

10.0

78.4

25.7

74.2

10.5

89.4

25040

Manipur

0.5

1.1

98.0

6.9

92.8

3.7

96.2

2146

Meghalaya

7.2

11.7

81.0

20.5

79.5

13.1

86.9

2543

Mizoram

0.5

14.5

84.6

40.0

59.5

14.7

84.8

780

Nagaland

6.1

3.2

90.0

69.8

29.1

30.7

68.2

805

Tripura

14.3

18.2

66.2

6.6

91.5

9.7

88.3

2333

Eastern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bihar

8.8

9.7

80.5

13.0

86.1

8.3

90.8

70804

Jharkhand

4.0

8.4

87.4

23.2

76.6

10.7

89.1

28238

Orissa

9.6

2.6

87.5

15.0

84.9

2.3

97.5

42341

Sikkim

1.2

6.2

92.6

18.8

81.2

6.9

93.1

531

West Bengal

13.1

16.7

69.7

21.9

77.3

11.8

87.7

69226

Central Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chattisgarh

28.7

6.5

64.8

11.3

88.7

1.4

98.6

27598

Madhya Pradesh

19.7

9.6

70.6

10.4

89.4

2.7

97.1

63206

Uttar Pradesh

21.5

10.9

66.7

14.7

84.3

4.5

94.9

171575

Uttranchal

9.2

13.9

77.0

26.2

73.8

13.0

87.0

8962

Western Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gujarat

14.3

10.7

73.3

10.7

88.5

5.8

93.8

37845

Maharashtra

21.1

6.5

72.2

24.2

75.8

5.8

94.1

65817

Southern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andhra Pradesh

16.7

12.4

70.6

10.6

89.1

5.5

94.4

60339

Karnataka

23.4

5.8

70.8

22.2

77.8

7.0

93.0

40413

Kerala

41.6

19.4

38.9

54.6

45.2

44.0

55.9

21946

Tamil Nadu

39.0

7.8

50.1

47.0

50.1

12.1

87.8

38880

Uts

37.1

4.0

58.8

30.0

66.9

12.3

87.7

732

All India

19.0

9.8

70.4

18.0

81.2

7.7

92.0

893504

No.of persons (' 00)

169171

87845

628156

161085

725238

68837

821740

893504

Source: NSSO (2005), Indebtedness of Farmer Households, 59 th Round (Jan-Dec 2003)

Report No. 498 (59/33/1)

 

Among states, awareness of the MSP and procurement agency by farmer households has been widespread among the farmer households of Haryana (43.6%) and Kerala (41.6%) (Table 4).

 

C.                   World Trade Organization (WTO): WTO is the only global international organisation dealing with rules of trade between nations. Administration of trade agreement, negotiations and handling trade dispute and monitoring national trade policies, technical assessment and training for development, cooperation with other international organisation are the main objective of WTO. It is the result of Uruguay round negotiation 1986-94 and established on 1.1.1995 and located in Geneva , Switzerland . Present membership is 151.

 

Farmer households numbering 82.2 million or 92 per cent of total farmer households at all- India level were not aware about WTO. Within the remaining farmer households, those in Kerala (44 %) and Nagaland (31%) have good knowledge of WTO (Table 4).

 

4. Farmers Liking for Farming

At all-India level, about 60 per cent of the farmer households reported that they liked farming (Table 5). The remaining 40 per cent were of the opinion that given a choice, they would take up some other career. Among this 40 per cent farmers, 27 per cent farmers do not like farming because the returns are not worthwhile; about 8 per cent reported that farming has been very risky. Only two per cent were reported that they do not like farming because of lack of social status.

 

There was a striking similarity among major states where farmers reported their liking for farming. More than 70 per cent of farmer households  in Arunachal Pradesh (72.1%), Meghalaya (77.4%), and Andhra Pradesh (75.4%) reported that they like farming as a profession.

   

Table 5 : Per cent Distribution of Farmer Households - Liking and not Liking Farming as a Profession

 

Liking

Not Liking Farming due to Reason

Total No. of

 

Farming

Not

Lack of

Risky

Others

Total

Farmer

 

 

Profitable

Social

 

 

 

Households

 

 

 

Status

 

 

 

( ' 00)

Northern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Haryana

60.3

29.9

1.3

4.6

2.4

38.2

19445

Himachal Pradesh

64.9

18.4

0.7

12.2

3.8

35.1

9061

Jammu & Kashmir

61.5

20.9

7.7

9.0

0.9

38.5

9432

Punjab

60.8

27.2

1.6

2.3

5.8

36.9

18442

Rajasthan

61.2

21.5

1.1

8.4

7.8

38.8

53080

North-Eastern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arunachal Pradesh

72.1

10.7

2.9

0.5

10.9

25.0

1227

Assam

59.0

21.2

2.1

13.1

4.5

40.9

25040

Manipur

67.4

28.2

2.0

1.8

0.4

32.4

2146

Meghalaya

77.4

15.2

0.5

6.1

0.8

22.6

2543

Mizoram

50.8

34.1

7.9

6.2

0.4

48.6

780

Nagaland

67.6

26.8

1.7

1.2

1.5

31.2

805

Tripura

52.5

20.2

2.5

17.0

5.6

45.3

2333

Eastern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bihar

48.6

35.2

2.2

10.7

2.4

50.5

70804

Jharkhand

52.8

30.2

2.2

8.9

5.7

47.0

28238

Orissa

53.1

33.8

0.4

8.9

3.6

46.7

42341

Sikkim

64.6

30.2

4.5

0.5

0.2

35.4

531

West bengal

53.8

35.4

1.8

4.7

3.6

45.5

69226

Central Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chattisgarh

53.7

24.2

2.6

17.4

2.1

46.3

27598

Madhya Pradesh

59.5

21.4

3.6

11.4

3.9

40.3

63206

Uttar Pradesh

58.8

24.0

3.5

9.8

3.2

40.5

171575

Uttranchal

46.8

42.3

0.8

4.3

5.8

53.2

8962

Western Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gujarat

66.8

25.4

1.0

5.0

1.5

32.9

37845

Maharashtra

60.7

28.6

1.0

7.4

2.3

39.3

65817

Southern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andhra Pradesh

75.4

16.7

0.6

5.2

1.7

24.2

60339

Karnataka

56.7

27.9

1.1

10.9

3.4

43.3

40413

Kerala

66.6

27.9

0.6

2.0

2.5

33.0

21946

Tamil Nadu

68.9

25.0

0.9

3.9

1.2

31.0

38880

Uts

65.6

24.6

4.8

1.9

3.1

34.4

732

All India

59.4

26.5

1.9

8.3

3.4

40.1

 

Source: NSSO (2005), Some Aspects of Farming, 59 th Round (Jan-Dec 2003), Report No. 496

 

 

 

5. Membership of Farmers Organisation/ Self Help Group (SHG)

Table 6 : Per 1000 Number of Farmer Households Having a member of Registered Farmers' Organisation and Self-help Group

 

No per 1000  of Farmer Households having a Member of a

 

Farmers'

Self- help

Total

 

Organisation

Group

Farmer

 

 

 

Households

 

 

 

(' 00)

Northern Region

 

 

Haryana

0

10

19445

Himachal Pradesh

7

88

9061

Jammu & Kashmir

6

2

9432

Punjab

3

15

18442

Rajasthan

4

6

53080

North-Eastern Region

 

 

Arunachal Pradesh

30

25

1227

Assam

70

82

25040

Manipur

3

92

2146

Meghalaya

0

185

2543

Mizoram

182

14

780

Nagaland

7

14

805

Tripura

5

11

2333

Eastern Region

 

 

Bihar

3

8

70804

Jharkhand

2

28

28238

Orissa

2

28

42341

Sikkim

1

18

531

West Bengal

40

19

69226

Central Region

 

 

Chattisgarh

24

65

27598

Madhya Pradesh

8

27

63206

Uttar Pradesh

10

15

171575

Uttranchal

9

49

8962

Western Region

 

 

Gujarat

59

32

37845

Maharashtra

22

49

65817

Southern Region

 

 

Andhra Pradesh

24

177

60339

Karnataka

52

81

40413

Kerala

105

199

21946

Tamil Nadu

34

129

38880

Uts

51

48

732

All India

22

48

893504

Source: NSSO (2005), Some Aspects of Farming, 59th  Round

(Jan-Dec 2003), Report No. 496

 

      Only 2.2 per cent of farmer households in rural India have a person who is member of registered farmers’ organisation. Among the 4.8 per cent of farmer households, there has been at least one person who is a member of a self help group where self help group is a voluntary gathering of people who share common problem, condition or history. These groups are formed usually by under privileged persons with the intention of developing financial stability and money management capacity through internal loaning of their own savings.

Farmers organisation and Self help group are most prevalent only in southern states and some states in north-eastern region. Further, to some extent among farmer households of West Bengal and Gujarat (Table 6).          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. Crop Insurance

Table 7 : Per cent Distribution of Farmer Households - Awareness of Crop Insurance

 

Household Not Insuring Crops because

Household Insuring their Crop

Total

Number

Farmer

Households

(' 00)

 

 

 

 

Not

Aware

 

Not

Interested

 

Facility

Not

Available

 

Lacking

Resources

for

Premium

Number

of Farmer

Households

( ' 00)

Per cent to

total

Farmer

Households

Number

of Farmer

Households

( ' 00)

Per cent to

total

Farmer

Households

Northern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Haryana

40.5

14.2

41.3

2.9

19425

99.90

20

0.10

19445

Himachal Pradesh

52.9

14.7

27.4

4.9

9032

99.68

29

0.32

9061

Jammu & Kashmir

24.9

2.6

71.5

0.6

9411

99.78

21

0.22

9432

Punjab

19.3

11.7

66.0

1.2

18234

98.87

208

1.13

18442

Rajasthan

54.7

7.1

37.4

0.8

53046

99.94

34

0.06

53080

North-Eastern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arunachal Pradesh

48.8

12.9

34.4

1.3

1183

96.41

44

3.59

1227

Assam

63.4

17.7

17.5

0.8

24994

99.82

46

0.18

25040

Manipur

52.2

7.0

38.1

0.8

1942

90.49

204

9.51

2146

Meghalaya

51.3

9.9

37.9

0.8

2516

98.95

27

1.05

2543

Mizoram

84.2

2.8

8.9

0.0

780

99.94

1

0.06

780

Nagaland

37.1

19.0

43.9

0.0

804

99.88

1

0.12

805

Tripura

24.9

23.2

44.7

3.6

2321

99.46

13

0.54

2333

Eastern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bihar

40.6

9.2

48.6

0.9

70245

99.21

559

0.79

70804

Jharkhand

66.7

7.0

24.7

1.4

28077

99.43

161

0.57

28238

Orissa

76.3

7.7

8.6

6.9

39101

92.35

3240

7.65

42341

Sikkim

58.0

7.8

33.7

0.0

531

100.00

0

0.00

531

West bengal

63.9

12.3

22.3

0.6

69153

99.89

73

0.11

69226

Central Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chattisgarh

65.9

20.1

8.4

5.3

25595

92.74

2003

7.26

27598

Madhya Pradesh

59.8

24.1

10.5

5.5

61792

97.76

1414

2.24

63206

Uttar Pradesh

54.2

12.8

28.4

2.0

169495

98.79

2080

1.21

171575

Uttranchal

53.6

11.9

32.6

1.0

8955

99.92

7

0.08

8962

Western Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gujarat

48.0

29.5

15.4

6.7

30481

80.54

7364

19.46

37845

Maharashtra

62.7

24.7

7.0

5.2

58762

89.28

7055

10.72

65817

Southern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andhra Pradesh

74.9

9.8

12.0

3.2

56264

93.25

4075

6.75

60339

Karnataka

53.8

25.1

12.6

8.5

37223

92.11

3190

7.89

40413

Kerala

29.2

54.9

10.4

5.5

20837

94.95

1109

5.05

21946

Tamil Nadu

55.7

32.7

8.9

2.3

37901

97.48

979

2.52

38880

Uts

46.2

38.5

14.0

1.2

717

97.95

15

2.05

732

All India

56.1

16.4

23.5

3.1

 

 

 

 

 

No.of persons (' 00)

474863

139008

198479

26157

846207

94.71

35592

3.98

893504

Source: NSSO (2005), Some Aspects of Farming, 59th  Round (Jan-Dec 2003), Report No. 496

At the all-India level, only 4 per cent of farmer households reported ever having insured their crops. Among those who had never insured their crops, a very large proportions – 56 per cent were unaware about the practice of crop insurance. While 16 per cent have reported not interested, 24 per cent said that the facility has not been available to them. A small percentage of farmers (3 per cent) felt that they could not afford to pay the insurance premium.

 

Among states, farmer households of Gujarat ( 19 %)  and Maharashtra (11 %) reported the highest proportion who have insured their crops. Among the remaining states, the proportion of farmer households of  Manipur (9.5%), Orissa (7.7 %), Chattisgarh (7.3%), Andhra Pradesh (6.8%), Karnataka (7.9%), and Kerala (5.1%) reported a proportion of crop insurance is more than all-India level ( Table 7).

 

7. Services of Co-operatives

At the all-India level, the survey has revealed that 17.6 million farmer households (19.7 %) have reported availing the services of co-operatives societies. A major portion of the farmer households numbering 71.8 million (80.3%), reported not availing the services of the co-operative societies. Among them a major portion 69.9 per cent were not even members of any co-operative society.

 

Table 8 shows state level data on the number of farmers availing services of the co-operative societies.  It can be seen from there that the farmer households of north eastern region states and eastern region states have reported less than the all India average proportion of availing the service of the co-operative societies. On the other extreme, more number of farmer households of southern region states were availing the services of co-operative societies. Considerable proportion of farmer households of Himachal Pradesh (47.0%), Chattisgarh (40.8%), Sikkim (33.9 %), Punjab (30.7%), Gujarat (38.2%), Maharashtra (36.5 %) and Kerala (38.5 %) have reported that they avail services  of co-operative societies.

 

 

Table 8 : Number  of Farmer Households Availing Service of Co-operative Societies

 

 

 

Number of Households

Availing Services of

Co-operative Societies

Number of households

Not Availing Services of

Co-operative Societies*

Number of Households

Not Members of

Co-operative Societies

EstimatedNo

of hhs

('00)

Northern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Haryana

5633

(29.0)

13812

(71.0)

11764

(60.5)

19445

Himachal Pradesh

4263

(47.0)

4798

(53.0)

3878

(42.8)

9061

Jammu & Kashmir

2145

(22.7)

7287

(77.3)

7083

(75.1)

9432

Punjab

5668

(30.7)

12774

(69.3)

10088

(54.7)

18442

Rajasthan

7551

(14.2)

45529

(85.8)

41721

(78.6)

53080

North-Eastern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arunachal Pradesh

167

(13.6)

1060

(86.4)

936

(76.3)

1227

Assam

2955

(11.8)

22085

(88.2)

20708

(82.7)

25040

Manipur

66

(3.1)

2080

(96.9)

1991

(92.8)

2146

Meghalaya

417

(16.4)

2126

(83.6)

2067

(81.3)

2543

Mizoram

82

(10.5)

698

(89.5)

567

(72.7)

780

Nagaland

6

(0.7)

799

(99.3)

753

(93.5)

805

Tripura

244

(10.5)

2089

(89.5)

1512

(64.8)

2333

Eastern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bihar

1528

(2.2)

69276

(97.8)

65140

(92.0)

70804

Jharkhand

14

(0.0)

28224

(100.0)

27476

(97.3)

28238

Orissa

6231

(14.7)

36110

(85.3)

33026

(78.0)

42341

Sikkim

180

(33.9)

351

(66.1)

308

(58.0)

531

West bengal

7853

(11.3)

61373

(88.7)

53927

(77.9)

69226

Central Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chattisgarh

11248

(40.8)

16350

(59.2)

13827

(50.1)

27598

Madhya Pradesh

18211

(28.8)

44995

(71.2)

36091

(57.1)

63206

Uttar Pradesh

22455

(13.1)

149120

(86.9)

134686

(78.5)

171575

Uttranchal

242

(2.7)

8720

(97.3)

8586

(95.8)

8962

Western Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gujarat

14452

(38.2)

23393

(61.8)

19187

(50.7)

37845

Maharashtra

24016

(36.5)

41801

(63.5)

30210

(45.9)

65817

Southern Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andhra Pradesh

11801

(19.6)

48538

(80.4)

41393

(68.6)

60339

Karnataka

8637

(21.4)

31776

(78.6)

25945

(64.2)

40413

Kerala

8450

(38.5)

13496

(61.5)

8844

(40.3)

21946

Tamil Nadu

10840

(27.9)

28040

(72.1)

21889

(56.3)

38880

Uts

176

(24.0)

556

(76.0)

479

(65.4)

732

All India

175615

(19.7)

717889

(80.3)

624819

(69.9)

893504

* Included households who are members but not availing the services

Note: Figures in brackets are percentages to all-India total

Source: NSSO (2005), Indebtedness of Farmer Households, 59 th Round (Jan-Dec 2003)

Report No. 496

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8. Seeds: Usual Source of Procurement

            At the all-India level, 45.3 per cent of farmers depend upon farm-saved seeds. Another 46.5 per cent usually purchase their seeds and 4.9 per cent acquired through exchange, i.e., in lieu of the crop produced by the household.

Table 9 : Per cent Distribution of Farmer Households by Usual Source of Procuring Seeds

 

Usual Source of Seeds

Estd No

 

Farm Saved

Exchange

Purchase

of hhs (00)

Northern Region

Haryana

4453

(22.9)

1439

(7.4)

9859

(50.7)

19445

Himachal Pradesh

4413

(48.7)

453

(5.0)

4186

(46.2)

9061

Jammu & Kashmir

6584

(69.8)

321

(3.4)

2462

(26.1)

9432

Punjab

5145

(27.9)

572

(3.1)

7358

(39.9)

18442

Rajasthan

11837

(22.3)

2866

(5.4)

38058

(71.7)

53080

North-Eastern Region

Arunachal Pradesh

924

(75.3)

85

(6.9)

184

(15.0)

1227

Assam

19156

(76.5)

901

(3.6)

4883

(19.5)

25040

Manipur

1348

(62.8)

139

(6.5)

644

(30.0)

2146

Meghalaya

2289

(90.0)

10

(0.4)

234

(9.2)

2543

Mizoram

655

(84.0)

17

(2.2)

97

(12.4)

780

Nagaland

719

(89.3)

11

(1.4)

65

(8.1)

805

Tripura

1155

(49.5)

84

(3.6)

1041

(44.6)

2333

Eastern Region

Bihar

42412

(59.9)

4531

(6.4)

22445

(31.7)

70804

Jharkhand

19795

(70.1)

847

(3.0)

7568

(26.8)

28238

Orissa

34508

(81.5)

1821

(4.3)

5928

(14.0)

42341

Sikkim

485

(91.3)

3

(0.6)

43

(8.1)

531

West bengal

31152

(45.0)

4430

(6.4)

32675

(47.2)

69226

Central Region

Chattisgarh

23376

(84.7)

1214

(4.4)

2953

(10.7)

27598

Madhya Pradesh

31666

(50.1)

5056

(8.0)

26420

(41.8)

63206

Uttar Pradesh

74635

(43.5)

11324

(6.6)

76522

(44.6)

171575

Uttranchal

7591

(84.7)

314

(3.5)

977

(10.9)

8962

Western Region

Gujarat

12754

(33.7)

2460

(6.5)

21042

(55.6)

37845

Maharashtra

18889

(28.7)

1251

(1.9)

45414

(69.0)

65817

Southern Region

Andhra Pradesh

9775

(16.2)

1327

(2.2)

48392

(80.2)

60339

Karnataka

12730

(31.5)

525

(1.3)

26430

(65.4)

40413

Kerala

14133

(64.4)

549

(2.5)

7023

(32.0)

21946

Tamil Nadu

10925

(28.1)

1050

(2.7)

21967

(56.5)

38880

Uts

337

(46.1)

35

(4.8)

285

(38.9)

732

All India

404757

(45.3)

43782

(4.9)

415479

(46.5)

893504

Note: Figures in brackets are percentages to  total

Source: NSSO (2005), Indebtedness of Farmer Households, 59 th Round (Jan-Dec 2003), Report No 496

 

 

 

 

 

State/UT level details are given in Table 9. Purchase of seeds was most common method of procuring seeds in Andhra Pradesh ( 80 per cent of households) followed by Rajasthan (72 per cent) , Maharashtra (69 per cent) and Karnataka (65 per cent). More than 80 per cent of farmer households in Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Orissa , Sikkim , Chattisgarh, and Uttranchal  reported that they depend upon farm saved seeds for their seed requirements. In all the states, the acquisition of seeds through exchange was also prevalent, but to a lesser extent.

9. Seeds: Frequency of Replacement of Seeds

                At the all-India level, 26.2 million farmer households (29 per cent) reported they were replacing their seeds varieties every year. 27.2 million farmer households were replacing their seeds varieties every alternate year and every third year, 18.2 million ( 20 per cent) farmer households were replacing their seed varieties. 14.7 million ( 16.5 per cent) farmer households were replacing their seeds only every fourth year. 

            Table 10 gives state level information about the farmer households tendency to replace seeds. In five states, viz., Rajasthan, Arunachal Pradesh, Maharashtra , Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, more than 50 per cent of the farmer households were experimenting with annual seed replacements.  More than 50 per cent of farmer households in Meghalaya and Kerala were more stable in using a particular seed variety at least for four years.

 

 

Table 10 : Per cent Distribution of Farmer Households by Usual Practice of Seed Replacements

 

Usual Practice of Seed Replacement

Estd No

 

every

alternate

after

after

nr.

of hhs

 

year

year

3 years

4 years

 

('00)

Northern Region

Haryana

20.9

34.3

22.5

3.3

19.0

19445

Himachal Pradesh

35.0

24.3

20.1

20.5

0.1

9061

Jammu & Kashmir

13.6

40.4

27.7

17.6

0.6

9432

Punjab

16.7

34.2

14.1

5.9

29.0

18442

Rajasthan

50.9

29.3

12.7

6.2

0.8

53080

North-Eastern Region

Arunachal Pradesh

51.1

15.4

12.0

18.3

3.2

1227

Assam

12.6

33.4

30.1

23.6

0.4

25040

Manipur

19.5

22.0

32.0

25.1

1.4

2146

Meghalaya

23.6

12.7

9.9

53.5

0.4

2543

Mizoram

46.2

10.8

3.5

34.7

4.8

780

Nagaland

25.2

12.6

42.9

18.3

1.2

805

Tripura

33.8

47.0

13.3

3.1

2.7

2333

Eastern Region

Bihar

23.8

30.6

22.1

21.5

2.0

70804

Jharkhand

14.6

23.3

36.5

25.4

0.1

28238

Orissa

17.7

35.0

29.1

17.9

0.3

42341

Sikkim

4.6

19.7

26.0

49.7

0.0

531

West Bengal

29.7

39.2

16.8

13.0

1.3

69226

Central Region

Chattisgarh

17.1

20.7

42.2

20.0

0.0

27598

Madhya Pradesh

18.1

23.7

27.6

30.4

0.2

63206

Uttar Pradesh

17.2

36.9

27.5

13.0

5.4

171575

Uttranchal

17.2

16.2

27.4

38.2

1.0

8962

Western Region

Gujarat

37.9

28.7

11.2

18.0

4.2

37845

Maharashtra

53.6

25.6

14.9

5.4

0.5

65817

Southern Region

Andhra Pradesh

56.2

27.4

7.1

7.9

1.4

60339

Karnataka

50.1

26.8

8.7

12.6

1.9

40413

Kerala

11.0

10.3

4.6

72.8

1.2

21946

Tamil Nadu

36.6

34.3

6.4

9.3

13.3

38880

Uts

28.2

30.7

9.4

20.8

11.0

732

All India

29.3

30.5

20.3

16.5

3.4

893504

estd.hhs ( 00)

261762

272150

181804

147012

30776

893504

Note: Figures in brackets are percentages to  total

Source: NSSO (2005), Indebtedness of Farmer Households, 59 th Round (Jan-Dec 2003), Report No.496

 

 

 *This note has been prepared by R. Krishnaswamy

 

Highlights of  Current Economic Scene

AGRICULTURE  

As per data compiled by the Food Corporation of India (FCI), central government agencies have procured 14.23 million tonnes of paddy by December 16, 2007 as compared to that of 15.04 million tonnes during the same period last year. The procurement in terms of rice equivalent has stood at 10.81 million tonnes as compared with that of 11.37 million tonnes during the same period last year. India ’s rice stock, as on December 1, 2007, has stood at 10.05 million tonnes.

 

National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd (Nafed) is expecting the arrival of 48,000 of yellow peas by December 22, 2007 of Canadian origin, while state owned trading firm PEC is awaiting for the shipment of about 45,000 tonnes of pulses which is expected to reach Indian ports by December-end. Consequently, with the supply increasing in the domestic market, prices of pulses are likely to ease in the short run.

 

According to Solvent Extractors’ Association of India (SEA), edible oil imports have surged by 38 per cent in November 2007 to 347,320 tonnes as compared with 252,242 tonnes during the same month last year, due to 75 per cent jump in the imports of crude palm oil (CPO). The country has bought 314,611 tonnes of CPO during November 2007 as against that of 180,036 tonnes a year ago. In the refined oil segment, RBD palmolein imports have soared to 445 per cent to 30,014 tonnes from 5,500 tonnes last year. However, imports of Olein have slumped to one-third to 995 tonnes in November this year as compared with 2,956 tonnes during same period last year. The import of vegetable oil during the same period has reported to stand at 427,912 tonnes as compared with 302,034 tonnes last year. The imports are comprised of 347,320 tonnes of edible oil and 80,592 tonnes of non-edible oil. Meanwhile, for the first time in the last five years, the country did not import crude soybean oil because of its high international prices. The difference in prices between the local and the imported soybean oil was as high as Rs 40 per 10 kg.

 

According to estimation undertaken by Indian Sugar Mills Association (ISMA) during the current season (2007-08), the production of sugar would be lowered from initial projection of 33-34 million tonnes to 30-31 million tonnes due to crushing delay and lower yields in certain states. The output is expected to cross 28 million tonnes produced during last season.

 

The central government in association with the Asia Development Bank (ADB) have planned to introduce a project, under which agri business centres (ABCs) would be opened in the districts of Maharashtra and Bihar . The detailed report regarding the project would be prepared by New Delhi-based Global Agri System (GASPL) and would be submitted by February 2008. There is also a proposal to export goods from these centres. The state government would provide land for setting up of these ABCs. Of the total project cost, 50 per cent would be made available by the Asian Development Bank on lower interest rate of 2.5-3 per cent, while farmers would contribute 10 per cent of the amount and rest of the cost would be raised by the special purpose vehicle of the related centre.

 

The central government has fixed a tariff for poppy seeds (khus-khus) of US $ 5,398 per tonne in an attempt to check its illegal imports into the country. This is to check under invoicing and selling of the seeds at US $ 1,500 per tonne when its price in Turkey , a major producer in the world, is between US $3,900 per tonne and US $ 5,200 per tonne.

 

According to Coir Board, India International Coir Fair (IICF) has generated export orders worth of Rs 45 crore through the participatory buyers. Around 106 buyers from 33 countries visited the Coir Fair, which had 75 stalls showcasing coir products. There were about 100 serious buyers and spot orders worth Rs 15 crore were placed and trade inquiries worth of Rs 105 crore were placed for materializing during short- to medium-term. As per the board, orders were sizable considering the total exports during 2006-07, which was of Rs 605.16 crore.

 

According to Rubber Board, synthetic rubber output during April- September 2007-08 has fallen down by about 1.1 per cent but consumption has risen by 6.1 per cent due to higher demand from auto tyre makers. It is anticipated that production in April-September 2007-08 was declined to 49,903 tonnes from 50,434 tonnes a year ago. Total consumption has risen to 143,145 tonnes from 134,855 tonnes during the same period. While demand from the automotive tyre sector has grown by 8.3 per cent to 94,352 tonnes from 87,156 tonnes. Tyre makers account for more than 60 per cent of the domestic synthetic rubber consumption and a rise in car sales would boost the demand for synthetic rubber. This has been reflected by 11.2 per cent increase in import of synthetic rubber to 93,045 tonnes during April-September 2007-08 as compared with 83,640 tonnes recorded during the same period last year.

 

According to coffee board, post-monsoon estimates have revealed that Indian coffee production has dropped by 9.96 per cent (or by 29,000 tonnes) at 2.62 lakh tonnes as against that of the post-blossom estimates of 2.91 lakh tonnes. The production loss has been attributed to the heavy monsoon rains resulting into drop of berry owing to wet feet conditions coupled with high-speed winds. Coffee production in Karnataka has been worst hit with the extent of crop loss being 71 per cent followed by Kerala (28 per cent), however, there was no production loss in Tamil Nadu. Post-blossom forecast predicts that production of arabica in the country is likely to decline by 8.19 per cent to 92,500 tonnes and Robusta by 10.91 per cent.

 

Farmers associations have urged the central government to lift the ban on futures trading in wheat, urad, tur and rice as it would provide farmers more flexibility in their market operations and consequently better price realisations. This would further lead to development of the futures market making an impact on the spot market structure and its practices by bringing efficiency to the supply chain machinery and developing grading, processing, warehousing, and other analysing facilities.

 

Consortium of Indian Farmers association (CIFA) has suggested the government to make agricultural research in the country more relevant for crops like tur (Arhar); so that yield can be increased, as its annual production is stagnant at 2.3 million tonnes as against that of an annual demand of 2.6 million tonnes. The gap between demand and supply are being met through imports.

 

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) has granted Rs 24.09 crore to National Academy of Agricultural Research and Management (NAARM) for the National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP). Main objective of this project is to combine the strengths of the public and private institutions to raise agricultural incomes through efficient management of value chain, to provide livelihood security and to enhance the competitive advantage of Indian agriculture. A workshop would also be organised for integration and finalisation of work plan and to divide the responsibilities among the collaborative institutions. It is expected that about 50 representatives from IIM-Lucknow, NIRD, MANAGE, and ASCI from Hyderabad , MSSRF-Chennai, GB Pant University, etc would attend the workshop.

 

As per the notification by central government dated on December 19, 2007, the government has initiated an optional compounded levy scheme for pan masala and pan masala containing tobacco (gutkha). The scheme has provided for payment of duty on the basis of number of packing machines installed in the factory premises of manufacturer of these goods. It has stipulated an option for payment of Rs 12 lakh as duty, per month per packing machine per line for gutkha pouches of retail selling price (RSP) up to Rs 1.50 and Rs 10 lakh for pan masala pouches carrying retail-selling price (RSP) up to Rs 1.50. Different duty slabs have been provided for pouches priced up to Rs 6. In case of multiple track or line packing machines, the rate of duty would be multiplied accordingly.

 

According to latest report by Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) of the UN, around 37 countries are facing acute food shortage on account of conflict and natural disasters. These have been compounded by unprecedented price hikes for basic food items due to low stocks; droughts and floods linked to climate change, high oil prices and increased demand for bio fuels. It is projected that the total cost of imported food for low-income food deficit countries (LIFDCs) in 2007 would be nearly 25 per cent higher than 2006 surpassing US $ 107 million. So, it has appealed to all governments and international community to take vital steps to protect the poor countries from negative impacts of rising food prices and to boost crop production in the most affected countries.

 

 

Industry

 The growth of 13.3 per cent in manufacturing sector pushed up the index of industrial production by 11.8 per cent during October 2007 as against 4.5 per cent in October 2006. Mining sector and electricity sector grew by 3.7 per cent and 4.2 per cent during the month. Out of the 17 industries, sixteen industries has registered positive growth. The only industry group, which have registered a negative growth Metal products and Parts. As per use-based classification, the sect oral growth rates in October 2007 over October 2006 are 6.2 per cent in basic goods industries, 20.5 per cent in capital goods and 14.2 per cent in intermediate goods. Consumer goods rose by 12.5 per cent due to substantial increase in the production of consumer durables and consumer non-durables. Consumer durables which was languishing since May 2007 has reported a smart turnaround in October 2007 with a growth of 9.3 per cent as against a marginal rise of 0.2 per cent in October 2006.

Inflation

 

The annual rate of inflation calculated on a point to point basis, stood at 3.65 per cent for the week ended December 8, 2007 as compared to 3.75 per cent for the previous week or 5.63 per cent as on December 9, 2006.

 

Primary Articles group declined marginally to 223.2 from 223.3 for the previous week.

Index of Fuel, power, light and lubricants remained stationary at the previous week’s level of 328.6 and the index of manufactured products also remained unchanged at its previous week’s level of 188.3.

 

Banking

 The country’s largest co-operative bank, Saraswat Co-operative Bank, has acquired the Nashik Peoples Co-operative Bank, which has an accumulated loss of Rs 40 crore. This is the fifth acquisition by Saraswat Bank in the last two years. The bank is understood to have plans to acquire two-three banks in the next four years.

 

NABARD has tightened norms to scrutinize audit reports of state-wise deposits of State Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Banks (SCARDBs) and District Central Co-operative Banks (DCCBs). According to Nabard’s decision, the audit reports received from these co-operative banks would be subjected to qualitative scrutiny. Nabard would see whether the contents and coverage are in tune with its guidelines on various aspects, particularly adherence to the audit classification norms, alignment of audit rating with supervisory ratings, coverage of issues as per audit report guidelines, compliance to prudential norms, preparation of the balance sheet as per the statutory requirement.

 

In a bid to fund its high growth in the country, German major Deutsche Bank has increased the capital base for group operations by Rs 2,155 crore. The capital infusion will take Deutsche Bank group’s total capital in India to over Rs 5,700 crore, making it among the highest capitalized foreign banks in the country. The fresh funding includes an infusion of about Rs 1,470 crore in Tier I capital for Indian branches and Rs 685 crore towards equity of the newly formed non-banking finance companies (NBFCs). This infusion follows fresh capital inflow of Rs 1,125 crore through December 2006 – April 2007.

 

Financial Sector

 

Capital Markets

Primary Market

Government-owned Oil India Ltd, the country’s second largest oil and gas company, has filed its papers with Sebi for an IPO that will partially dilute Government’s stake in the company. The shares will be listed on both BSE and NSE with the share price of Rs 10 each for cash at a price to be decided through a 100 per cent book-building process for 2,64,49,982 equity shares.

 

Porwal Auto Components Ltd, engaged in manufacturing and selling SG and CI castings for the automobile sector, on the last day of its IPO was subscribed 1.03 times across the price band on both the BSE and NSE. It received a total of 5,16,650 bids. The qualified institutional investors portion was subscribed 0.21 times, the non-institutional investors were subscribed by 0.48 times while the retail investors where subscribed by 2.44 times.

 

The initial public offering (IPO) of Mundra Port and SEZ Ltd (MPSEZL), which hit the capital market in November, was subscribed by 116 times and became the largest-ever grosser in Indian corporate history with more than Rs 2 lakh crore, and also demonstrated another new record as the number of retail investor-applicants from the southern States increased five times.

 

The stock of Jyothy Laboratories Ltd, got listed on the NSE at a premium of 29.71 per cent at Rs 895 against the offer price of Rs 690.On BSE it made its debut at a premium of 15.79 per cent at Rs 799. On the NSE, the stock traded at a high of Rs 895, and closed at Rs 794.05, whereas on the BSE the stock closed at Rs 793.70.The total shares traded were 51,36,540 shares and 36,65,147 shares on the NSE and BSE respectively.

 

Nearly half of the companies that have filed documents with the Sebi for IPOs during the past two years are yet to hit the market. Market sources cite several reasons, including change in business plans, lack of government guidelines on foreign equity participation in certain sectors, observations by the regulator and other resource-raising options like private equity funding, for the phenomenon.

 

KNR Constructions Ltd, an infrastructure project development company, is to enter the capital market soon with an initial public offering of 78,74,570 equity shares of Rs 10 each for cash at a price to be decided through a 100 per cent book-building process. The company has filed its Draft Red Herring Prospectus with Sebi.

 

Secondary Market

Due to negative global cues, the week started with a huge fall on Monday, when the BSE sensex closed 770 points lower. During the week, the markets remained volatile and closed with minor gains on Thursday, as market was closed on Friday due to Bakrid. Mid-caps and small-caps, which were outperforming the large frontline stocks in the last few days, were also in correction mode, as the breath turned negative. Over the week, the BSE Midcap index corrected 4.85 per cent. At the beginning of the week, BSE sensex recorded its biggest single-day fall in four months. The BSE sensex shed 3.84 per cent, to 19,261.35, which is the biggest fall in the index since August 16, when it fell 642.7 points (4.2 per cent). The NSE Nifty dived 270.7 points, or 4.48 per cent, to 5,777, the largest ever points fall for the index. The previous biggest fall was on May 18, 2006, when the index fell 246.20 points.  The markets plunged on concerns that rising inflation in the US may bring an end to rate cuts by the Fed. The year-end selling by foreign institutional investors (FIIs), unwinding of participatory notes (P-notes), derivatives through which foreigners buy stocks on the Indian markets, by hedge funds and profit-booking by the big operators ahead of the trading holidays abroad accentuated the fall.  According to traders, the RBI’s notification on December 14, 2007 asking banks not to give payment guarantees to FIIs on their purchases also added to the bearish sentiment.

 

All the sectoral indices of BSE declined over the week except on BSE IT and BSE Healthcare. Profit taking contained the surge on the capital goods and metal scrips. These two sectors posted the highest one-year returns among indices. Over the week, the BSE Midcap index corrected 4.85 per cent. IT stocks which were facing selling pressure gained as the rupee took a knock vs the dollar.  

 

Technology, auto, FMCG and pharmaceutical stocks may be the most battered sectors of the Indian stock market this year.  But select mutual fund schemes were able to notch up good returns despite being in these sectors by tweaking the investment mandate and smart stock-picking within the mid- and small-cap segments.  The BSE sensex gave nearly 38 per cent returns this year, even as IT, auto and pharma indices gave poor returns in 2007 on the rupee appreciation, fears of a US recession and high interest rates in India .    Benchmarked against the BSE Teck Index, DSPML’s Technology.com fund has managed to give annual returns of 57.95 per cent as on December 20. The index itself has gained by 2.05 per cent, while the BSE IT index fell by 19.52 per cent since the start of the year.    

 

Booming equity markets have enabled mutual funds to collect a record sum in new fund offerings (NFOs) in this calendar year.  Fund houses collected in excess of Rs 27,500 crore in 2007, with several ongoing or just-concluded equity-oriented NFOs yet to announce their collection figures. The money mopped up through NFOs last year was Rs 28,970 crore. Infrastructure and global funds hogged the limelight this year, with funds such as SBI Infrastructure Fund Series-1 (Rs 2,536 crore), Fidelity International Opportunities (Rs 1,557 crore), ICICI Prudential Indo Asia Equity Fund (Rs 1,000.72 crore) and Tata Indo Global Infrastructure (Rs 2,200 crore).

Jasdaq Securities Exchange Inc, Japan ’s biggest market for startups, is in talks about an alliance with the country’s Bombay Stock Exchange amid plunging trading volumes.   

According to Takashi Tsutsui, chief executive officer of the Tokyo-based bourse, Jasdaq aims to lure Indian companies to sell Japanese Depositary Receipts on its Neo Market for technology stocks. Tsutsui said he hopes to reach a formal agreement as early as next month.  We see opportunities to use our experience in the global market and we can do that by allying with exchanges around the world.

 

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi)-promoted National Institute of Securities Markets (NISM) is all set to become a central registry of all intermediaries in Indian capital markets. In the long term, NISM will be the central registry of every person working in the financial markets and it will serve as a pool of information to know the advisor’s history for employers and investors alike, said one of the panelists at a workshop organised by Sebi and chaired by its chief M Damodaran. The NISM has been made responsible to co-ordinate the task of certification in Indian securities markets that would also include maintenance of a complete database of all market participants who have been certified by it.

 

Sebi has suggested that the RBI will be the right authority to regulate private equity (PE) investments in the country.  In a letter to the government, Sebi has stated that as PE investments are mostly made in unlisted companies, it has to depend on RBI for the information.  RBI maintains the data on PE investment for monitoring the inflow and outflow of funds, while the stock market regulator has the authority to collect data for listed entities or companies either operating in primary or secondary capital markets.       

 

On December 20,2007 Sebi allowed short selling of shares by all classes of investors, both institutional and retail. Short selling had been banned by the regulator in the wake of the Ketan Parekh scam in 2001. Short selling refers to the sale of stocks which the seller does not own at the time of selling. To provide for settlement of shares sold short, Sebi was also providing a mechanism of securities lending and borrowing (SLB) for all market participants.

 

A committee of directors of IFCI Ltd has decided to issue about 12.374 crore new equity shares at a price of Rs 107 per share (including premium of Rs 97 per share) to public sector banks and financial institutions (FIs). These shares are to be issued towards the conversion of zero coupon optionally convertible debentures (ZCOCDs) amounting to Rs 1,323.99 crore held by various public sector banks and FIs.

 

Derivatives

Sebi may be worried about FIIs punting in the derivative segment of the Indian stock market, but retail investors have not only taken to it just as avidly but also outrank every other category of investors. At the National Stock Exchange retail investors accounted for nearly two-thirds of the derivatives turnover for October 2007, the latest month for which such data is available. They contributed 64 per cent to the turnover while proprietary trading broking members of the NSE accounted for roughly 25 per cent and institutional investors, both domestic and foreign, came a distant third with around 11 per cent. This is not a one-off phenomenon as the data for the earlier months too showed retail investors’ contribution hovering around these levels.

 

On December 17, 2007, Sebi invited comments from market signaling the regulator’s intention to move fast on the proposed products before December 21, 2007. The Sebi board, at its meeting on November 14, 2007 cleared the introduction of seven new products, namely, mini-contracts in equity indices, options contracts with longer life/tenure, F&O contracts on volatility index, options on futures, F&O contracts on bond index, exchange-traded currency (foreign exchange) F&O contracts and exchange-traded products involving different strategies. In a note, put on its website, Sebi explained details on each of the products, which formed the crux of the Sebi’s Derivatives Market Review Committee headed by Rammohan Rao.

 

The support between Nifty 5675-5750 seems quite strong and there is further support at 5600. Monday saw one of those meltdowns where sympathetic vibrations lead to collapses in every global market. The Nifty lost over 300 points intra-day before it turned from the depths of 5740. It dropped further on Wednesday when it hit 5676. By the end of a truncated week, the Nifty closed at 5766.5 points for a loss of 4.65 per cent. The Defty was down 5 per cent as the rupee lost ground. The Sensex was off 4.34 per cent at 19162.57 points. The Nifty Junior was down 5.21 per cent. Declines far outnumbered advances. Volumes were exceedingly high on Monday and Tuesday as there was panic selling. The BSE 500 was off 4.7 per cent while the CNX Midcap lost 4.86 per cent. The CNX IT did however, gain marginally due to the rupee decline. The Nifty closed at 5766.50 in the spot market and it was settled at 5789.55 in the December series, at 5776.7 in the January series and 5767 in February. About 5 lakh December series were closed out and nearly 6 lakh in January positions were opened. The difference between December and January can certainly be traded by a long January and short December position. The difference between the spot and the December contract could be indicative of a market that is expected to trend up somewhat next week.  In the Nifty Junior, the spot closed at 11648 while the December contract settled at 11706 and January at 11695. There is about 51,000 open interest in the January contract. The differential between the futures is too small to be traded. The premium of the futures to spot could again indicate a reasonably optimistic market position.   

 

The Bank Nifty took a hammering last week and closed at 9245 in spot. The December and January contracts were settled at 9312 and 9351.5 respectively with the January open interest being about 25,000.  The CNX IT rose a little on the back of rupee weakness and closed at 4594 in spot with the December and January contracts settled at 4601.35 and 4531.75 respectively and a January open interest of 77,000. The Bank Nifty may be due for a bounce and the CNX IT is also looking mildly positive. The CNX IT also offers a reasonable calendar spread of long January, short December.  In the Nifty options market, the put-call ratio in terms of open interest has fallen to 1.08, which is a slightly dangerous signal. Generally, a low PCR suggests an overbought market but in relative terms, 1.08 is a neutral level. In the Nifty puts, the open interest has expanded in both December and January series, which is interesting since there are just three sessions to go for settlement. However, in the Nifty calls, there has been a contraction in the December open interest coupled to a larger expansion of open interest in January.   

 

Government Securities Market

Primary Market 

Eleven State Governments auctioned 10-year paper maturing in 2017 through an yield based auction using multiple price auction method on December 18, 2007 at cut-off yields ranging from 8.39-8.58 with the lowest for Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand and the highest for Jammu & Kashmir.

 

On December 19, 2007, RBI auctioned 91-day and 364-day T-bills for the notified amounts of Rs.500 crore and Rs.1,000 crore  respectively. The cut-off yields for 91-day and 364-day T-bills were 7.35 per cent and 7.66 per cent respectively.  

 

Secondary Market

Call rates ended at 4-4.25 per cent, down from 7.5-7.7 per cent previously since bankers had already covered their borrowing requirements in advance. Outflows towards corporate tax payments exerted pressure on the tight liquidity conditions forcing call rates to remain firm. However, the impact of outflows was felt to be less than initially feared.

Apart from tax payments, other large outflows were not scheduled during the week, keeping call rates under control.  Bonds softened in the week by thin trading as credit offtake slowed down ahead of a long holiday season. According to traders, volatility in the foreign exchange market had little impact on bonds, as domestic factors overwhelmed exit by foreign institutional investors. Yields eased on hopes that cash conditions would return to they normal levels in the New Year backed by government spending. The 10-year yield ended at 7.87 per cent, three basis points down from the previous week’s close of 7.90 per cent.

 

At the weekend liquidity adjustment facility auction, banks took recourse to the RBI’s repo window for Rs 22,370 crore. There were about 20 banks and primary dealers who took recourse to the RBI’s repurchase window. But bankers said the recourse to the repo window was also largely driven by the refiners accessing their credit lines for settling their maturing oil import bills. In fact, refiners’ recourse also resulted in hardening of rates at the Collateralised Borrowing Lending Obligations markets, where the weighted average rate for the weekend was 6.88 per cent, though the rate was considerably lower than the RBI’s repo rate of 7.75 per cent.

 

Bond Market

Power Finance Corp tapped the market by issuing bonds to mobilise Rs 200 crore for 3 years through book building, to be linked to 1 year Gilt yield for 5 and 10 years. The bond has been rated AAA by crisil and icra.

Dena bank is tapping the market by the issuance of perpetual bonds by offering 10.05 per cent for call at the end of 10 years for an amount of Rs 100 crore.  The bond has been rated A by crisil and fitch.

 

Demand for commercial papers (CPs) is on the rise with mutual funds investing more in such short-term instruments. The total amount of outstanding CPs issued by companies rose by about 80 per cent to Rs 42,183 crore on October 31, 2007, against Rs 23,521 crore during the same time last year. According to Mr Arvind Chari, Fund Manager, Fixed Income, Quantum AMC, there is a latent demand from mutual funds for commercial papers and certificate of deposits as these are typically short-term instruments and they fit the overall maturity profile. The demand for CPs, however, falter when the mutual funds are hard pressed for cash particularly during the time of advanced tax outflows or tight liquidity conditions in the market.

 

Foreign Exchange Market

Due to strengthening of dollar and a slump in global stock indices, the rupee slipped to two-week lows. FII inflows turned negative as markets approached the year-end and the holiday season. Although the unit opened strong at 39.33/$, it later slipped to as low as 39.67/$ intra-week. The rupee closed for the week at Rs.39.57 per US Dollar on December 20, 2007, as compared with Rs. 39.35 per US Dollar as on December 14, 2007. The rupee moved between Rs. 39.37 and Rs.39.57, with a standard deviation of 10 paise during the week. The six-month forward premia closed at 1.53 per cent (annualized) on December 20, 2007 vis-à-vis 2.02 per cent on December 14, 2007.

 

Commodities Futures derivatives

According to B C Khatua, chairman, Forward Markets Commission (FMC), an alternative market to sell agricultural commodities, which could scale up the income of farmers, was only possible through their direct participation in futures trading with the help of representative institutions. Khatua said that commodity exchanges and FMC were working on various models of aggregation that would institutionalise the direct involvement of farmers in commodity futures. This could enable better price discovery and efficient risk management.  The regulator in the past had hinted that it was in the process of identifying aggregators who could participate in comexes on the behalf of farmers.

 

According to Rajesh Agrawal, Soybean Processors Association of India, India is on track for record exports of the animal feed this year after selling 2.5 million tonnes since October. While the country, being Asia’ biggest supplier of soymeal, already reached more than half of the targeted exports of 4.5 million tonnes for the year through September 2008, as buyers including China seek supplies amid a global shortage.

 

The Central government, in association with the Asia Development Bank (ADB), is planning to open 60 agri business centres (ABCs) in Maharashtra , including 12 in Nashik, next year.  The government has selected Maharashtra and Bihar for the project. New Delhi-based Global Agri System (GASPL) is preparing a detailed project report in this regard. The report will be submitted by February 2008.   

 

NTPC, the country’s top power generating firm, expects to float a joint venture firm with NCDEX, PFC and others by month-end for the purpose of setting up India ’s second power exchange.  According to NTPC Chairman and Managing Director T Sankaralingam, efforts are on to sign an agreement for the joint venture in the next 15 day. As they have already talked to all the promoters. We just have to sit and sign the agreement, which will be done in the next 15 days before the end of December, Sankaralingam told PTI. Power sector regulator Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) had directed NTPC and NCDEX to form a separate company for the proposed power exchange.   

 

Wheat rose above $10 a bushel for the first time, leading other grains and oilseeds higher in a food price spiral that threatens global economic growth. Chicago wheat futures jumped as much as 30 cents, or 3.1 per cent, to $10.095 as dry weather threatened crops in Argentina , renewing concern that the world’s farmers may not be able to grow enough to meet the rising demand for bread, pasta and livestock feed. Rice also advanced to a record, while soybeans gained to the highest in 34 years and corn reached a nine-month peak.  Rising prices of food and fuel are stoking inflation and making it more difficult for central bankers to lower interest rates

 

NCDEX has withdrawn the additional margins imposed on pepper, jeera, chana, guar gum, guar seed, red chilli, mentha oil and maize with effect from December 24,2007 as per the directives received from the Forward Markets Commission and in terms of the Bye-laws, Rules and Regulations of the Exchange.

 

Commodity markets have remained relatively strong in the current year with price performance of select commodities setting new record or reaching multi-year highs. While tightening demand-supply fundamentals influenced the crude market, gold attracted considerable investor interest for a host of reasons. Agricultural commodities too displayed unprecedented price action, supported by burgeoning demand from the bio fuels sector and lower production following competition for acreage and weather aberrations.

 

India Inc is expected to witness a slowdown in sales growth during the third quarter of the financial year 2008 to 13 per cent compared to a sales growth of 24.7 per cent witnessed during the December 2006, quarter according to CMIE. The slowdown in sales was largely on account of a significant slowdown in sales expansion in sectors like chemicals, food products, commercial vehicles, auto ancillaries, aluminum and a modernization in the robust growth of sectors like cement, steel, metals and hotel industry. Banking, construction, telecom, air transport and NBFCs are expected to witness a healthy growth during the quarter.

 

One of the country’s largest supermarket chain the $3.4 billion conglomerate RPG’s subsidiary Spencer’s is going for an image makeover. In a strategic shift, the company is moving from running discount stores to that of an upmarket, premium retailer. Spencer’s would be pumping Rs 3,000 crore into its retail network in the next few years.

 

ABG Shipyard, one of India ’s major private shipyard company, has received repeat orders worth about Rs 1,040 crore from its existing four international customers. Following this fresh order, the total order book position stands at Rs 8,277 crore.

 

Telecom

Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) has won a $150 million contract from the country’s third largest private mobile operator, the Aditya Birla group’s Idea Cellular Ltd., to build and provide managed services for a Greenfield GSM network in Bihar . The network would be ready for commercial operations by early 2008 subject to spectrum availability. This is the second Idea Cellular contract bagged by NSN this year.

   

  

Macroeconomic Indicators

Table 1 : Index Numbers of Industrial Production (1993-94 =100)

Table 2 : Production in Infrastructure Industries (Physical Output Series)

Table 3: Procurment, Offtake and Stock of foodgrains

Table 4: Index Numbers of  Wholesale Prices (1993-94 = 100)

Table 5 : Cost of Living Indices

Table 6 : Budgetary Position of Government of India

Table 7 : Government Borrowing Programmes and Performance

Table 8 : Scheduled Commercial Banks - Business in India  

Table 9 : Money Stock : components and Sources

Table 10 : Reserve Money : Components and Sources

Table 11 : Average Daily Turnover in Call Money Market

Table 12 : Assistance Sanctioned and Disbursed by All-India Financial Institutions

Table 13 : Capital Market

Table 14 : Foreign Trade

Table 15 : India's Overall Balance of Payments

Table 16 : Foreign Investment Inflows  
Table 17 : Foreign Collaboration Approvals (Route-Wise)
Table 18 : Year-Wise (Route-Wise) Actual Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI/NRI)

Table 19 : NRI Deposits - Outstandings

Table 20 : Foreign Exchange Reserves

Table 21 : Indices REER and NEER of the Indian Rupee

Table 22 : Turnover in Foreign Exchange Market  
Table 23 : India's Template on International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity [As reported under the IMFs special data dissemination standards (SDDS)
Table 24 : Settlement Volume and Netting Factor for Government Securities Transactions Settled at CCIL - Monthly, Quarterly and Annual Basis.
Table 25 : Inter-Catasegory Distribution of All Types of Trade in Government Securities Settled at CCIL (With Market Share in Respective Trade Types) 
Table 26 : Category-wise Market Share in Settlement Volume of Government Securities Transactions (in Per Cent)
Table 27 : Settlement Volume and Netting Factor for Total Forex Transactions Settled at CCIL - Monthly, Quarterly and Annual Basis.
Table 28 : Inter-Category Distribution of Total Foreign Exchange Transactions Settled at CCIL (With Market Share in Respective Trade Types) 

 

Memorandum Items

CSO's Quarterly Estimates of GDP  

GDP at Factor Cost by Economic Activity

India's Overall Balance of Payments  

*These statistics and the accompanying review are a product arising from the work undertaken under the joint ICICI research centre.org-EPWRF Data Base Project.

LIST OF WEEKLY THEMES


 

We will be grateful if you could kindly send us your feed back at epwrf@vsnl.com